Booking expectations have changed (and they’re not going back)

In 2026, patients compare your booking experience to the rest of their life: ordering, reservations, delivery, streaming, everything.

When scheduling feels slow or unclear, people don’t wait patiently. They keep shopping.

Press Ganey summarizes this shift well: digital scheduling is now mainstream, but satisfaction still lags—61% rate online scheduling positively while only 27% call it excellent, and 24% would think twice about booking if they couldn’t do it digitally.

‍

Consumers are telling us what they want: access + availability

Kyruus’ 2023 Care Access Benchmark Report found:

• 61% of consumers say online scheduling availability is extremely/very important when choosing care.
• 89% say appointment availability is extremely/very important overall.
• Common reasons for not scheduling online include the option not being offered or availability not matching needs.

In other words: patients aren’t just asking for online scheduling. They’re asking for online scheduling that actually works.

‍

Adoption is still early in many practices

MGMA polling suggests a lot of organizations are still in the early stages:

• 71% of practices reported less than 25% of patients using digital self-scheduling tools.
• Only a small share reported more than half of patients self-scheduling.

That gap is an opportunity for aesthetics practices: you can feel modern without needing enterprise complexity.

‍

After-hours booking is a real slice of demand

If your practice only “books” when the phones are open, you’re ignoring the hours when many people actually have time to act.

A healthcare case study (Optum/Change Healthcare) reported:

• 74% of consumers say scheduling after hours is important.
• About 43% of online-scheduled appointments were booked after business hours.

Zocdoc has reported a similar pattern in its marketplace behavior (nearly half of appointments booked after hours on their platform).

‍

Online scheduling can improve utilization (with nuance)

A peer-reviewed study on online appointment scheduling found online booking share increased over time and was associated with improved utilization metrics in a practice setting; it also reported lower no-show rates for online-booked appointments in that practice—while noting cancellations/rescheduling behavior can differ between online vs offline.

Translation: online scheduling can help fill calendars and reduce friction—but you still need good policies (reminders, deposits, confirmation flows) to protect against last-minute changes.

‍

What a modern aesthetics booking experience includes

You don’t need to copy a hospital system. You need a fast, clear, patient-friendly flow:

1) Service-specific booking paths

• Injectables consult.
• Skin treatments.
• Body contouring.
• Follow-up / existing patient.

2) The right friction in the right places

• Use a consult-first flow where appropriate.
• Use deposits or card-on-file for high-demand slots.
• Make cancellation/reschedule rules clear up front.

3) Inventory clarity

• Patients abandon when the next available time is unclear.
• They can’t tell which provider fits their need.
• The flow forces a phone call to finish.

4) Smart reminders

• Confirmations + reminders reduce no-shows and last-minute gaps (and protect staff time).

5) Digital front desk coverage

• Online scheduling should be live 24/7.
• Missed calls should route to text + booking.
• Web chat should capture intent + move to schedule.

‍

What to track (your 4-metric booking dashboard)

If you publish one internal dashboard for the team, make it this:

• After-hours bookings (% of total).
• Time to first response (by channel).
• Booking completion rate (started → booked).
• No-show + late-cancel rate (by service).

‍

The takeaway

The front desk is no longer just a desk. It’s a set of digital entry points—calls, forms, chat, text, DMs, and booking links.

The practices that win in 2026 will treat scheduling like a product experience: simple, fast, and always available.

‍

Sources & further reading

• Press Ganey: online scheduling experience insights — https://info.pressganey.com/press-ganey-blog-healthcare-experience-insights/online-appointment-scheduling-last-mile
• Kyruus 2023 Care Access Benchmark Report PDF — https://info.kyruushealth.com/hubfs/Kyruus%20%20Benchmark%20Report%202023%20for%20Healthcare%20Organizations.pdf
• MGMA Stat: digital self-scheduling adoption levels — https://www.mgma.com/mgma-stat/meeting-pressure-on-patient-digital-self-scheduling
• Optum/Change Healthcare case study PDF (after-hours booking share) — https://marketplace.optum.com/content/dam/change-healthcare/marketplace-assets/stlukes_casestudy.pdf
• PMC article (online appointment scheduling study) — https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12081397/
• Zocdoc: after-hours booking behavior — https://www.zocdoc.com/resources/blog/article/why-not-offering-after-hours-booking-is-driving-away-patients/

‍